The Illusion of Control: How Zooming-Out Liberates Us
It's Time to Transcend the Zoomed-In Mindset
Human consciousness often clings to a zoomed-in state, fixated on personal narratives, viewpoints, and structures that provide an illusion of control. This hyper-focused perspective stems from a primal need for safety, where individuals anchor themselves to familiar stories and rigid frameworks to navigate life’s uncertainties. By staying zoomed-in, people believe they can manage their environment, relationships, and outcomes. However, this narrow focus creates a self-imposed "control Matrix"—a mental construct reinforced by societal systems like governments and financial institutions, which thrive on maintaining order through deductive rigidity. These systems often perceive those who transcend this mindset—zooming-out to see the broader picture—as threats to their authority, labeling them as disruptors or villains in a drama of their own making.
Deductive rigidity refers to the strict application of fixed premises to reach conclusions, often stifling inquiry by treating those premises as unchallengeable, leading to inflexible and potentially flawed outcomes. In contrast, abductive reasoning offers flexibility by inferring the best explanation from observed facts, adapting to new evidence and context to align further with truth.
Abductive reasoning is a form of logical inference that starts with observations and seeks the simplest, most likely explanation, embracing uncertainty and iteration. It thrives on generating and refining hypotheses, often leading to surprising yet plausible conclusions, as seen in Sherlock Holmes’ investigative approach.
A sacred cow is a belief, tradition, or idea held as unquestionably true or untouchable, often defended without scrutiny. It serves as a psychological or cultural anchor, resisting challenge due to its perceived importance or emotional weight.
Deductive rigidity, the strict adherence to fixed premises, stifles inquiry and perpetuates this zoomed-in state. It treats foundational assumptions as unchallengeable, leading to inflexible conclusions that resist new evidence. In contrast, abductive reasoning—embracing the best explanation based on observed facts—offers a flexible, adaptive approach that aligns with truth. This process involves zooming-out to generate hypotheses by seeing the broader context, then zooming-in to test these hypotheses with deductive reasoning, ensuring they hold under scrutiny. A well-balanced and autonomous individual cultivates the ability to zoom-in and out at will, navigating complex situations without becoming trapped in either extreme. Staying perpetually zoomed-in or zoomed-out is unhealthy; the former risks self-absorption, while the latter may detach from practical realities. Zooming-in to examine details does not imply submission to self-absorbed narratives or controllers—it reflects a reasoned response to context, enabling clarity and effective decision-making in a complex world. Those trapped in deductive rigidity fear zooming-out, as it risks dismantling their carefully constructed illusions of control. Their stories, or "sacred cows," become shields against the discomfort of broader perspectives, which could expose flaws in their worldview. This fear of losing control drives resistance to meaningful dialogue, particularly with individuals who embody reasoned, principled character.
Socratic humility is the intellectual virtue of recognizing and embracing the limits of one’s knowledge, fostering openness to learning and growth. It counters arrogance by encouraging a continuous quest for truth without diminishing self-worth.
Fallibilism is the intellectual character trait that acknowledges all beliefs and knowledge are subject to error and open to revision based on new evidence. It fosters humility and critical inquiry, encouraging individuals to question assumptions while pursuing truth through reason.
Certainty often fuels this illusion of control, acting as a substitute for truth and providing a false sense of safety. Certainty, a byproduct of the deductive process, is mistaken for truth when individuals cling to rigid conclusions to anchor their reality without challenging their root premises prior to zooming-in with their deductions. This certainty, while offering comfort, locks people into a zoomed-in mindset, where the need to feel secure overrides the pursuit of deeper understanding. Within the broader abductive process, certainty can emerge as hypotheses are tested, but fallibilism and Socratic humility ensure flexibility, allowing individuals to adjust their views as new evidence arises. By embracing this adaptability, zoomed-out individuals achieve a dynamic certainty—one grounded in reason rather than dogma—freeing them from the control Matrix that equates certainty with truth and control.
Zoomed-out individuals, guided by abductive reasoning, Socratic humility, and fallibilism, experience a profound sense of autonomy and freedom. They recognize that the need for safety is itself a product of the zoomed-in mindset, where hyper-focus breeds anxiety and control-seeking behaviors. By stepping back, they see the interconnectedness of people, ideas, and systems, fostering intellectual courage and clarity. This perspective heals the psyche, dismantling the need for rigid control. However, zoomed-in systems—be they personal or institutional—view this autonomy as destabilizing to their deductively rigid order. Governments and financial structures, built on deductive frameworks, often suppress dissent to maintain their version of order, reinforcing the control Matrix that keeps humanity tethered to narrow thinking.
Shadow work is the process of consciously exploring and integrating the repressed, unconscious aspects of one's psyche, such as fears, traumas, or undesirable traits. It aims to foster self-awareness and personal growth by confronting and resolving these hidden elements through introspection and reason.
Shadow work, the transformative process of confronting and integrating repressed aspects of the self—such as buried fears, insecurities, unresolved traumas, or unacknowledged desires—plays a crucial role in breaking free from the confines of a zoomed-in state. By illuminating these hidden elements with the light of consciousness and reason, individuals can “depersonalize” their stories—those deeply ingrained narratives that anchor them to a rigid sense of identity, often shaped by past experiences or societal expectations that demand conformity. Each shadow brought to light not only loosens the grip of these stories but also dissolves the emotional attachments that fuel their power, enabling one to zoom out incrementally and gain a broader, more nuanced perspective on their place within the interconnected web of human experience. This introspective journey fosters intellectual empathy, as it cultivates an understanding of others’ struggles mirrored in one’s own, and enhances autonomy by disentangling the self from the illusions of control tied to personal or societal myths that perpetuate fear and rigidity. Ultimately, this process paves the way for a more reasoned and liberated existence, where self-awareness becomes the foundation for ethical decision-making and a harmonious alignment with truth.
Transactional Love is a conditional exchange where affection or care is offered with the expectation of receiving something in return, such as validation or reciprocation. It operates like a contract, driven by external motives and often tied to a sense of obligation or debt.
Non-Transactional Love is given freely without expecting repayment, rooted in genuine care and intrinsic motivation. It prioritizes authentic connection and truth, unbound by calculations or external rewards.
The word “transaction” originates from the Latin “transactio,” meaning “an agreement” or “completion,” derived from “trans-” (across) and “agere” (to act or do). It refers to an act of carrying out or settling an exchange between parties, often implying mutual action or performance.
Agape love, in traditional Greek usage, refers to a form of love that prioritizes the well-being of others without expecting anything in return, often associated with divine or universal compassion, and is distinctly non-transactional as it seeks no reciprocation or zoomed-in personal benefit, deferring instead to a zoomed-out “bigger picture” personal benefit. In the New Testament, agape is elevated as the highest form of love, exemplified by God’s empathetic love for humanity and Jesus’ teachings, such as loving one’s enemies and neighbors as oneself, transcending the transactional debt accrued by sin.
The zoomed-out mindset aligns with non-transactional love, akin to the Greek and Christian concept of agape love. This form of love sees the bigger picture, respecting individual agency while understanding how parts interrelate within the whole. It avoids sacrificial demands, recognizing that true care fosters growth without compromising selfhood. In contrast, transactional love—rooted in sin as debt, karmic debt, or ledger-based thinking, whatever you wish to call it—remains zoomed-in, viewing relationships as exchanges to be balanced. This mindset fuels a sense of control but traps individuals in cycles of obligation and resentment, reinforcing the victimhood and narcissistic defenses that guard fragile personality frameworks.
Scapegoating and projection involve displacing one’s internal shame or guilt onto innocent others, treating them as vessels for unresolved moral debt. This mechanism allows individuals to avoid accountability by falsely attributing their flaws or burdens to those who should bear no responsibility.
Narcissism epitomizes the zoomed-in state, where individuals, driven by shame and a need to protect their victimized self, employ aggression, projection, false accusations, and scapegoating to maintain their illusion of control. They resist other perspectives, as acknowledging them would force a confrontation with their vulnerabilities. This dynamic mirrors broader societal patterns, where zoomed-in systems attack those who challenge their narratives. In contrast, the Logocentric individual, grounded in a zoomed-out perspective, may outwardly resemble a narcissist due to their strong personality and refusal to bend to hyper zoomed-in stories of victimhood or self-absorption. However, unlike the narcissist, who diverts focus to a "me-me-me" narrative, the Logocentric individual seeks to guide others toward the bigger picture, encouraging a broader, more reasoned understanding that transcends personal fixation. The story of Jesus on the cross illustrates this tension: his zoomed-out perspective, embodying agape and reason, threatened the deductive rigidity of legalistic authorities, who scapegoated him to preserve their control, unable to tolerate the freedom his teachings represented.
Law is the shadow of reason; whereas children require rules from their parents to navigate life, adults instead use reason to guide their morality and decision making. ~Nathan Martin
Laws are only meant to be an age appropriate way to communicate reason, and what is reasonable, to small children. Spiritually and psychologically mature adults do not need laws then, as they have reason to guide their morality and ethical decision making, what Locke called the “law of reason”. ~Nathan Martin
John Locke’s law of reason refers to a universal moral code discoverable through rational thought, guiding individuals towards understanding principles of justice, cooperation, and self-preservation. It’s essentially a natural law accessible to all capable of logical reasoning, independent of divine revelation or societal dictates.
A rational process is a moral process. You may make an error at any step of it, with nothing to protect you but your own severity, or you may try to cheat, to fake the evidence and evade the effort of the quest – but if devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality, then there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking. ~Ayn Rand
Children, in their developmental immaturity, require rules to navigate their zoomed-in world. Laws serve as simplified proxies for reason, guiding them toward safety and structure. However, as individuals mature, reason should supplant external rules, allowing for a zoomed-out approach to morality. John Locke’s "law of reason" encapsulates this idea—a universal moral code discovered through rational thought, independent of external dictates. Adults who rely on laws rather than reason remain psychologically stunted, clinging to the control Matrix of childhood. Reason, as Ayn Rand notes, is a moral process, demanding intellectual rigor and devotion to truth over comfort or illusion.
The law of reason liberates individuals from the need for external laws, fostering autonomy and ethical clarity by grounding moral decisions in rational thought rather than imposed rules. It demands intellectual courage to confront sacred cows—those deeply entrenched personal narratives or societal dogmas that resist scrutiny due to their emotional weight or cultural reverence. This process involves embracing the uncertainty inherent in abductive inquiry, where hypotheses are formed and tested with an open mind, guided by fallibilism and Socratic humility. Zoomed-out individuals recognize that control is an illusion born of fear, perpetuated by rigid adherence to deductive frameworks that stifle growth. By letting go of this rigidity, they align with truth, not by abandoning structure but by grounding decisions in a broader, more flexible understanding of reality, where reason leads and stories serve as tools for insight rather than chains that dominate thought and action.
The control Matrix persists because zooming-out threatens entrenched power structures—both within individuals and across societies—that rely on deductive frameworks to maintain order, often at the expense of truth and individual freedom. Governments, financial systems, and self-absorbed identities cling to these rigid structures, using them to enforce compliance and suppress dissent, as the zoomed-out perspective exposes their fragility and challenges their authority. Those who dare to zoom-out, embracing abductive reasoning and the law of reason, disrupt this status quo by questioning the unexamined assumptions that underpin it. They embody a heroism described by Ayn Rand, taking full responsibility for their own thinking and rejecting the false safety of rigid narratives that demand conformity. This act of intellectual independence not only dismantles personal illusions of control but also undermines the broader societal mechanisms that perpetuate the control Matrix, fostering a path toward authentic autonomy and rational integrity.
Ultimately, the path to a more zoomed-out existence is a journey toward self-realization, where the zoomed-out state, embodied by the Logos and abductive reasoning, must reign as the master of consciousness. The zoomed-in state, currently the dominant force in society, should submit to the zoomed-out state and take its rightful place as a humble servant to the higher Logocentric perspective. By prioritizing intellectual Socratic humility, empathy, courage, fairmindedness, and confidence in reason, individuals can dismantle their personal control Matrix, rejecting the false security of transactional love, victimhood, or the seductive certainty that masquerades as truth. This shift, guided by the zoomed-out Logos and the abductive process, not only heals the psyche but also lays the foundation for a freer, more rational world, where morality is governed by reason rather than fear.
Did you enjoy the article? Show your appreciation and buy me a coffee:
Bitcoin: bc1q0dr3t3qxs70zl0y5ccz7zesdepek3hs8mq9q76
Doge: DBLkU7R4fd9VsMKimi7X8EtMnDJPUdnWrZ
XRP: r4pwVyTu2UwpcM7ZXavt98AgFXRLre52aj
MATIC: 0xEf62e7C4Eaf72504de70f28CDf43D1b382c8263F
THE UNITY PROCESS: I’ve created an integrative methodology called the Unity Process, which combines the philosophy of Natural Law, the Trivium Method, Socratic Questioning, Jungian shadow work, and Meridian Tapping—into an easy to use system that allows people to process their emotional upsets, work through trauma, correct poor thinking, discover meaning, set healthy boundaries, refine their viewpoints, and to achieve a positive focus. You can give it a try by contacting me for a private session.